The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is believed that rising the petrol cost is one of the most effective solutions to the global environmental issue. From my perspective, I am in complete agreement with this viewpoint due to the following reasons.
The first reason is that the increase in fuel price could address the pollution problem. In other words, when the cost of fuel is expanded, people tend to be resisted from commuting by their private vehicle such as car and motorbike; instead, they are encouraged to carpool or use public transport systems. That means, emissions from private vehicles in megacities are diminished. Take Hanoi as an illustration for the strong link between pollution and petrol fee extension. Reportedly, a study from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment recorded that the rate of pollution in Hanoi has halved since the government tripled the price of fuel. What can be inferred from this is that it is efficient in decontaminating pollution in megacities once the price of fuel is escalated.
Another reason is that increasing fuel cost may help mankind save their natural resources. To be more specific, if the expense of fuel is raised, people will use their vehicles less, which means fewer raw materials being exploited. Recent research suggests that non-renewable resources associated with fuel price increases strongly. Accordingly, a study in a city in Russia recorded that since the price of fuel soared due to the Russia-Ukraine war, this country has not exploited natural deposits for several months. This directly suggests that increasing fuel prices helps people to save natural resources which are on the edge of depleting.
In conclusion, the price of petrol should be increased because of not only pollution in megacities but also the natural resources.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- percentage of tourists to scotland who visited different attractions 11
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all male and female workers by occupation in the UK in the year 2005 11
- The graphs below show the unemployment rate of citizens in the US with a further classification displaying average salary per week in 2005 Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The diagram below show how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22648083624 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88192700879 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550522648084 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4271201153 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199831490402 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779312089238 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587824893144 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112683900435 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039761277134 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.