The best way to solve the environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is contended that raising the cost of finite resources is the top activity to preserve the Earth. While this is a standard solution in various worldwide countries, I believe it is far from the most appropriate method.
To demonstrate, the governments increase the fossil cost by setting a higher level for its taxes. These taxes are a combination of environmental taxation, consumption taxation, and import taxation for those nations which cannot provide a sufficient amount of petrol by themself. These significant taxes reduce unsustainable energy consumption and restrict the number of fuel clients due to their expensive. As a result, this method can ensure the immediate consequences, especially when the fuel price increases through the fluctuations of global issues.
It is impossible to argue against the practical impacts of this tactic; However, this is a short-term strategy. The environment has been devastated by numerous factors, and the primary reason is the fossil fuel emissions. Although these production activities of humankind contribute to global warming and pose a threat to all living creatures, it is difficult for the majority to exchange to clean energy sources. Recently, gas and coal, as well as the maintenance and running costs of its products are relatively more affordable and more common in manufacturing, specifically in the developing countries, compared with renewable energy. Therefore, they are the dominant sources of energy for the public. By increasing their prices, the economic would be affected by some finance barriers in trading and mass-producing.
In brief, I opine that the authorities should find another ways, which have long-term effect, to deal with environmental problems. These new policies should direct the society to planet-friendly habit, as well as encourage the economic development.
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
- the table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interest in certain sports 11
- In the future the main reason for going to the shopping mall will be for entertainment not to shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- the table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in brief, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56890459364 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15592611527 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1713803089 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122943973761 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366509899057 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360986734926 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634866825748 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318036845072 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.