The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do u agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do u agree or disagree?

Escalate the earth fuel’s price is one of the keys to reducing the environmental problem. I agree with this because it can reduce the earth’s fuel users and also it can make people move with using public transportation for their daily activities.

Reducing earth’s oil users is one of the most profitable things that appear by increasing the oil’s cost. Furthermore, the oil’s consumer will change their habit to use the alternatives energy which is more friendly to the environment. According to the research held by the University of Maldives. When the crude oil’s price is increased, then the demand of crude’s oil will reduce, and people will move to the solar energy and the crude’s oil impact to the environment will also decline.

Changing people’s habit of using Government buses and trains is also the benefit of increasing price. When we boost the price, people will try to move for seeking another shipment which is lower cost than pay for the crude oil for their cars. Public transportation is one of the best ways to solve it because It will decrease the traffic jam’s intensity by reducing the private car’s users in the boulevard. Based on research from the ministry of general work, when the crude’s oil price is increasing, the street consumer will search for another transport and they will use the public’s transport for its alternative.

In conclusion, A strict rule should be made from the government for preventing and punishing the rule’s breaker so we can reduce the environmental problem and we can live in this world without any doubt.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-14 Wildanfars 56 view
Essays by user Wildanfars :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'alternatives'' or 'alternative's'?
Suggestion: alternatives'; alternative's
...umer will change their habit to use the alternatives energy which is more friendly to the en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22348484848 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01594848231 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0518363023 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217063876766 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988208876259 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668009357718 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137027376277 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335493264243 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.