The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Raising the petrol price is believed to be the best solution to alleviate environmental issues. From my point of view, although this measure can help tackle air pollution to a degree, this is not the most optimal way as creating environmental social awareness would be a more effective approach.
On the one hand, increasing fuel prices would lead to a decrease in using it, helping to reduce the large amount of exhaust fume that contaminates the air. Indeed, once the cost per transportation kilometer soars, commuters may resort to cheaper means of transport or decrease their time on the road. For instance, in the year 2022, fuel costs busted out worldwide when the economy recovered after the COVID-19 pandemic, during that time, many people transitioned to riding bikes or using public transportation while other groups of people chose online work. In addition, the increase in fuel costs fosters humans into using alternative energy and inventing energy-saving machines, devices, or vehicles. To illustrate, in Vietnam, electric vehicles produced by Vinfast Corporation have become more and more preferable resting not only on cost-saving traits but also on state-of-the-art functions that are not inferior to normal motorbikes or cars.
However, I still opine that an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues. To be more specific, the causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals used in both agriculture and industry which contaminate air, water, and land. Therefore, the most effective solution would be running a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of noxious chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods. For example, if governments apply a lower tax on companies that leave less impact on their surroundings, enterprises will proactively find ways to reduce their carbon footprint. In terms of individual consumption, more environmentally friendly shopping habits, such as using fabric bags, should be educated and spread out among consumers through purchase incentives and marketing campaigns.
In conclusion, it is justifiable to say that increasing the price of fuel partly addresses air pollution. However, I suppose that it is not the best resolution for complicated environmental problems that demand a comprehensive global campaign to convey messages and education so that each individual and group can consciously protect the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant 78
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 84
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53634085213 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10135160762 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611528822055 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1877678428 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.785714286 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180270500098 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629900438137 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041299094681 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111236507401 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254125210277 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.