The best way to travel is travel in a group led by a tour guide. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Since the beginning of 21st century more folks have started to explore attractions and remarkable sights all around the world. An opinion exists that the most convenient way of foreign culture acquaintance is through special company with relevant specialization. I completely disagree with the above-mentioned statement due to the reasons described below in my essay
Firstly, agencies prepare product with strict agenda and timetable with no opportunity to re-arrange and modify upon tourist interest. Excursions duration and rest periods are commonly created rigorously that leave low agility for a person to experience surrounding atmosphere. The same applies to eating out as dinning location and dishes are often dictated by organizers who might choose unattractive venues. For example, in 2018 my mother who is fond of oil painting was compelled to visit castles and churches in Paris through organized trip. Thus, inability to fully pursue our heart’s desire during the long-awaited journey might result in blurred impression and frustration.
Secondly, the wages of receiving party are included at the final price and are obviously much higher than going rate that lead to less lucrative conditions for tourist. All transport services imply increased cost for a driver, petrol, parking and a potential ticket for overspeed that a customer cannot regulate. Cities who experience fluctuation of demand driven by seasonality periods manage to harmonize budget shortage through packaged visitors. For example, my sister calculated that anniversary tour to London in 2019 would cost 20% less for exact same amenities if were executed independently. Hence, budget oriented individuals might experience less value of purchased services formed by a third party operator as mandatory costs are incorporated in to margins.
Taking into account all mentioned above, I’m convinced that the activities arranged by tour guides result to be less fascination as they usually are not financially viable and leave no room for improvisation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behaviour What is your opinion 89
- It is more important to have a good family than to have friends Family can always compensate for absence of friendship To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema. In the nearest future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...s result to be less fascination as they usually are not financially viable and leave no roo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, third, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62012987013 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9433335861 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691558441558 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2714081965 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0345120991117 0.244688304435 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0106026843654 0.084324248473 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0173043626229 0.0667982634062 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0264035772635 0.151304729494 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217595255929 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.