Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.
The issue of remuneration for work has always been widely debated as employees value different factors. Some people claim that to receive monetary reward is more crucial rather than obtain pleasure out of the accomplished work. I completely disagree to the above mentioned point of view due to the reasons marked hereinafter.
Above all, I personally believe that being content with the job is more meaningful in comparison with just receiving a large salary as it promotes greater success in a career. Having received a positive feedback at the work, a person feels excited about the activity and due to that achieves better results in future. Moreover, such employees increase efficiency at work by encouraging the colleagues with their enthusiasm for their work. For instance, the SpaceX founder, Elon Musk, has always enjoyed his work and even at times of financial difficulties he was motivated to continue scientific activity. Thus, inspired worker is more capable of overcoming all the challenges and reaching greater career goals.
In my opinion, people delighted with their jobs remain mentally and physically healthier than the once motivated by finance only. What is more, such employees lead more balanced and healthy lifestyle due to the less exposure to stress and negative emotions. According to Financial Times, more than 70% of respondents confirm that after the change for more preferable employment and consequently for another lifestyle their health indicators improved. Hence, focusing on the monetary side of work implementation a person may considerably worsen their health condition and the way of life in general.
In conclusion I would like to stress that job fulfillment is much more substantial than salary. Obviously, no amount of money can buy balanced, healthy life of a person who sincerely refers to his job as a favorite activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | bassmodulators123 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | TLan168 | 11 | view |
- Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas 89
- For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the world However nowadays people s values have changed and we tend to consider science technology and business more important than arts What do you think are the causes of this 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives Do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- You have recently travelled on a train and unfortunately left your luggage Write a letter to the manager of the Lost and Found department of the railway regarding the luggage you accidentally left on the train In your letter give details of your train tri 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and due to that achieves better results in future. Moreover, such employees increase effi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndition and the way of life in general. In conclusion I would like to stress tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33783783784 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84451434695 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618243243243 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4730448971 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190513339846 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657336331674 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757990473993 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121283724326 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570732263913 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.