Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.
How true do you think this statement?
What measures can government take to discourage people from using their cars?
Nowadays, what is the reason for increasing the traffic jam in major cities, it is resulted due to the rate of car ownership, which is rapidly raised up over the last thirty years. So, this essay will explain about the arguments of reason behind traffic jam and how it will reduce by encouraging people with sort of solutions.
First of all, in this competitive era, car companies provide attractive offers in terms of discounts on price of car and many more. Therefore, people was attracting towards the car ownership and resulted the car population in major metro cities. In addition to this, there are also certain reasons like improving the level of living and many more, which affected the traffic jam. According to the survey, in 1990 to 2010, in the London city, traffic jam was raised upto 60% because of increasing rate of the car ownership day-to-day.
On the other hand, to tackle this situation, government would take some steps towards discouragement of car ownership. Firstly, government would implement some taxes on the price of car. Thus, people will think first, while they will buy the car. Secondly, government would launch the public transport with good interior facility. Hence, citizens will attract towards the public transport instead of their own cars. According to the report of ministry of road and transport, 35% of people do not use their own cars for daily transport activities. As a result of this, traffic jam reduced by 15%.
To conclude this topic, it is quiet obvious that the traffic jam would be reduced by applying the certain solution like reducing car ownership and using more and more public transport.
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
- As children becomes adults, their social behaviour changes in some ways.what are the main differences between young children's behaviour and that of adults? To what extent are the changes that take place good? 73
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking, without meeting other people face to face. What are the effects of this on individual and society? 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend more money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both the vi 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to the rate of car ownership, which is rapidly raised up over the last thirty y...
^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouraging people with sort of solutions. First of all, in this competitive era, c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey, in 1990 to 2010, in the London city, traffic jam was raised upto 60% because ...
^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g rate of the car ownership day-to-day. On the other hand, to tackle this situat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, sort of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54188810278 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6116643773 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339033837153 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119222648316 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492983368599 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20440910875 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436685414061 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.