The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Given are two line graphs depicting the fluctuation in the proportion of family units possessing three distinct electronics, namely washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner and the aggregate figure of house chore hours measured by week in each household over a phase of a century from the 1920s.
It is conspicuous that due to the popularity of electrical appliances over years, the number of hours spent on housework soaked drastically. Furthermore, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner gradually became the requisite items in each family.
In terms of the percentage of households owning electronic items, 40% in the total was announced to have washing machine while only 10- percent lower claimed the appearance of vacuum cleaner in their house. In opposition, there was no one deciding to obtain a refrigerator in their house during the first year. However, within the next 40 years, a drastic change eventuated despite an apparent increase in the number of electrical appliances. Nearly 90% of households used refrigerator to store their houses when exactly 70% was reported for both the remaining ones. Towards the end of the stage, all family units utilized refrigerator and vacuum cleaner since the year 1980 and 2000 respectively. In contrast, that of household owning washing machine fell slightly to roughly 63% in 1980 before witnessing a moderate recovery during some last years with over 75%.
Due to the aid of electrical appliance in housework, the total number of hours for doing chores plunged significantly from 50 in the 1920s to approximately 20 hours in 1960, which was followed by a gradual decrease with over 10 hours in the last year shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-21 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | baljit12 | 78 | view |
- 12 Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own localenvironment Do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 81
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the types of media to get the daily news by age group in 2011 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two line graphs depicting the fluctuati...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2156133829 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88306680179 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1340156907 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.3 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107111327345 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440548925501 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437614085618 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696502343005 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326363689337 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two line graphs depicting the fluctuati...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2156133829 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88306680179 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1340156907 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.3 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107111327345 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440548925501 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437614085618 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696502343005 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326363689337 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.