In cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
In sprawling cities and other urban areas on the globe, the heavy flows of traffic are a common challenge. This essay will discuss the main reason and offer some possible solutions to this problem.
The prime reason for the increasing traffic is the use of private vehicles. As metropolitan areas develop, there is a wide range of newcomers flocking to large towns and cities in search of job opportunities and stable settlements. As a result, a huge quantity of individual modes of transportation is brought to urban regions, exacerbating road congestion during rush hours. A typical instance is the city of New York where numerous personal cars often create traffic gridlocks on every route before and after office hours.
There are multiple solutions to this threatening issue. The first measure is that there should be road expansions to accommodate heavy vehicle flows. To be more specific, the roads need widening with various designated lanes for particular types of vehicles. By doing so, small motorcycles and big automobiles can travel on their own paths, reducing the traffic jams in peak times. Secondly, a law which charges more fees for entrance into central locations should be enacted. No rules being imposed on cars into city centers, drivers keep on going without any fear of restrictions. If there is such a rule, the drivers would re-consider prior to steering vehicles into the central spots. Finally, public awareness should be raised. Most traffic problems escalate mostly due to drivers not giving precedence to one another. Road users in society can learn how to drive in a harmonious way with other people on the same road by seeing educational contents distributed on social media or newspapers.
In conclusion, the rise in individual vehicles is the prime cause of the huge volume of traffic, and the 3 proposed measures could be adopted to handle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that traditional culture is being damaged as it is used as a tool for making money in the tourism industry Others think it is the only way to protect culture and tradition Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However others people think that zoos are useful to protect rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows the development of the cutting tool in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Topic Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...on cars into city centers, drivers keep on going without any fear of restrictions. If th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 870, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harmonious way" with adverb for "harmonious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...users in society can learn how to drive in a harmonious way with other people on the same road by s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1064516129 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73506729938 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6731607019 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1176470588 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210045163585 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592593838532 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509407618662 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136614296143 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477289267411 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.