All around the globe, in large metropolitan cities and urban areas, traffic congestion is increasing tremendously at an alarming rate, attributed some serious issues. In my opinion, I think that traffic problem is mainly due to unreliability of public transport, change in life style of human and other various reasons. This issue could be mitigated if government promote public transport usage by surge in buses and trains services and decrease in traveling cost.
To begin with, traffic jam is a pervasive and critical concern in big cities of many countries in the world that causes delay, unreliability, loss of comfort and efficiency, and environmental problems over the urban areas. There are several reasons behind this terrible problem. Firstly, in the last few years, immense number of people has been migrated from rular to urban area that contributed significantly in traffic issue by putting more strain on roads due to high number of private vehicle usage. In other words, people come from village ares to large cities to get highly paid jobs, to gain some good qualification from various colleges or universities and for these aforesaid reasons require travel from one place to another for work or study purposes that create the necessity to keep own vehicle and eventually led traffic congestion issue. Secondly, these days people keep their own private vehicle for comfort and status symbol. For example, in this modern time, people think that car is mandatory for their household to travel in comfort zone, even for very small distance for shopping and other purposes. Along with this, people think that it is absolutely essential to have vehicle to show status of their living in the society and that sense of materialistic life put extra burden on roads. Thirdly, in some metro cities, public transport is unreliable and traveling fare is very expensive so to avoid delay to work and to save extra cost of traveling people prefer private vehicle. Finally, in some countries, there is lack of traffic sense in people and they break traffic rules that create a awful traffic issue. For instance, in morning rush office and school hour, everyone wants to reach on time and due to lack of rule sensibility, they block traffic by using wrong lanes that ultimately result in big traffic jam.
However, there are numerous solutions of this traffic problem. One solution is that government should increase the reliability of public transport by expanding the number of bus and train services and by decreasing the travel fare. Furthermore, government should promote proper understanding of traffic rules and regulations and eco-friendly travel as well. To illustrate, everyone should in the city should be well acquainted with traffic rules and there should be fine and strict punishment to breach the rules. Along with this, travel by bicycle and car sharing should be promoted to avoid road congestion. Moreover, advance technology is having significant role in control congestion at busy hours and improve traffic flow. Like in Singapore, intelligent transport system led dramatic improvement in traffic by maximising road network efficiency and monitoring traffic flow to improve traveling conditions.
In conclusion, there are variety of different factors that are responsible for high level traffic problem in urban areas. While, to tackle this issue government should impose strict traffic rules, improve public transport, decrease travel fare, promote eco-friendly transport means and use of advance technology.
- In many government like to spend more money on the arts Some people agree with this However some think government should spend more on health and education Discuss both side and give your opinion 75
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interest Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1162, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...long with this, people think that it is absolutely essential to have vehicle to show status of their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1611, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd they break traffic rules that create a awful traffic issue. For instance, in m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 10.4138276553 278% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 41.998997996 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2980.0 1615.20841683 184% => OK
No of words: 560.0 315.596192385 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32142857143 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70370116692 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516071428571 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 934.2 506.74238477 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.76152304609 336% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7940460905 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.454545455 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197846553076 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722443770223 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631545616016 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133454704214 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00342745888902 0.056905535591 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.