Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet but there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution Do you agree

In this day and age, global warming has become an outrageous concern. Many people are emphasizing on the fact that there are not essential legal actions taken by government. In my perspective, I completely give my affirmation to this suggestion.
The fundamental explanation is that environment conservation is each and everyone’s task. The government must spread awareness by making strict rules and regulations. However, their practical implications are mandatory thing because they are not meant to be written on papers only. Moreover, the ruling parties are much more focused towards sustaining their positions and making money. Hence, they are not putting any sort of pressure on industries which are contaminating the globe constantly. For instance, in many parts of the world there is no limit in usage of water on daily activities. That is how people are reluctant toward it’s consumption and do not bother about wastage.
Additionally, apart from political parties, general population is also not bothering regarding this intimidating issue. Most of them are only interested in their own growth despite knowing the potential consequences. They will find some flaws or illegal outcomes for their sustainability. Unfortunately, thus is especially seen amongst young generation who are much more aware about limited natural resources and endangering conditions. Still they will be lethargic towards their consumption.
To conclude and recapitulate, surrounding weather needs to be taken care. The current remedies are not only going to be sufficient for their savage. Combined efforts from government as well as society will be needed.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...l resources and endangering conditions. Still they will be lethargic towards their co...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, apart from, for instance, sort of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58964143426 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10905572806 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4494631353 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.9444444444 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9444444444 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.029400653597 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0088149808139 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0165579828381 0.0667982634062 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0184192218737 0.151304729494 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016698971424 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...l resources and endangering conditions. Still they will be lethargic towards their co...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, apart from, for instance, sort of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58964143426 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10905572806 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4494631353 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.9444444444 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9444444444 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.029400653597 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0088149808139 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0165579828381 0.0667982634062 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0184192218737 0.151304729494 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016698971424 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.