Companies use different ways to increase sales. What different ways do companies use to increase sales? What way is the most effective?
The sole purpose of a for-profit organisation organisations is to generate ample revenue through a number of marketing tactics and strategies. Depending on the type of products and the characteristics characters of the services, companies can implement different approaches including promoting products through advertisements, or to a more extreme perspective, producing scarcity producing in scarcity. Despites that, I personally believe that these strategic plannings should not be mutually exclusive but a collective effort to meet the end goal.
The proponent of stimulating stimulate sales and thus generating more profit could be done through promotional campaigns campaign such as doing advertisements. In fact, advertisement has been tacitly used by organisations due to its versatility since it stipulates organisations with a vast number of beneficial incentives including raising awareness for new products, reaching out to a new market segment or simply to reiterate the company’s existing products to the existing consumers’ portfolio. For instance, mass production companies such as Coca Cola or any mainstream commodities can prominently benefit by using promotional advertisements as it meets the company’s targets with minimal expenses per capita in comparison to personalised marketing. Opinions differ as majority believe that advertisements reign supremacy over any other sale strategies; yet my conviction is that, despite the aforementioned merits, it still lacks measurable tools to quantify precisely the correlations between advertisements and revenue.
Though advertisement is more worthy to reach out to the mass public, producing in scarcity is exerting its dominance toward a more high-end luxurious market. Companies has been increasingly adopted this marketing strategy, namely strategy namely Louis Vuitton, Chanel. By producing in scarcity, companies are able to keep their price at an exorbitant figure and still manipulate the market to purchase. Essentially, companies’ operative costs are well managed, and revenues are quantifiable. However, there are always is always two sides of a coin. By , by inhibiting the number of products, companies forfeit their shares of the remaining market segments where they could have earned exponentially.
In conclusion, the common strategic plannings to increase sales can notably be through advertisements for the mass market or aiming at a niche market with scarcity production. I personally opine that no single tactic is better off than the other but rather a multi approach approaches should be employed to maximise profit generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-03 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 89 | view |
- All large companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community Do you agree or disagree 61
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What way is the most effective 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...always is always two sides of a coin. By , by inhibiting the number of products, c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89763779528 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37671678145 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8823088131 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143533954499 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450364901205 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351976098817 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808756673533 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354559738029 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.