The compensation of senior management should be reasonable and consistent with wages of the workers. Do you agree or disagree
In today’s world, it is widely perceived that the remuneration of executive level staff should be adequate and parallel to the entry-level workers’ income. While ensuring a fair payment across the corporation level, I disagree with the notion that superior employees’ wages should directly mirror workers’ wages.
There are numerous reasons why the emolument of senior management would be the predominant amount compared with the workers’ payment, one of which is the fact that seniors management hold the strategic reins of the company. In particular, superior management makes critical decisions concerning finances, staffings and stewardship; therefore, their choices make profound impacts on the company’s success. Moreover, opting to a high-stake decision is stressful, thus justified their higher compensation. Another validation would be for their specialized skills in certain expertise, should upper managers tend to possess their well-accumulated skill through grappling with inundated workload or risky sequences, they will be paid higher. For instance, a similar pattern could be seen in the success of tech startups as the fierce competition in human resources, hence requiring them to utilize higher wages as an attraction for workers that acquired a honed skillset.
Regardless, advocating for reasonable compensation does not equate to endorsing exorbitant pay packages for senior management, specifically when there is a vast disparity to the workers’ wages. In this case, laborers’ working zeal can be eroded due to the hierarchical structure in the communal workzone. In other words, this situation can breed resentment in the working environment. For example, the scenario is relatable in the retail industry, when CEOs make millions annually, cashiers and stockers are always struggling to make ends meet. The argument here is that the CEO’s salary is not embedded in the company's success compared to the effort of the frontline workforce.
In sum, superior managers should be respectfully higher as it attracts skillful workers and attributes to the company’s accomplishment. Admittedly, this raise should be adequate to the former contribution to the company. Fostering a healthier work environment.
- Nowadays a lot of companies switch to open offices Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
- Some say parents whose children are breaking the law should be punished in some way To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The table below shows the number and percentage of sentenced male and female offenders in South African prisons between 2010 and 2014
- Air transport is increasingly used to export fruits and vegetables to countries where they cannot be grown or are out of season Some people say it is a good thing but other people think it can t be justified Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'seniors'' or 'senior's'?
Suggestion: seniors'; senior's
... payment, one of which is the fact that seniors management hold the strategic reins of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in particular, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80966767372 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13497356523 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619335347432 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7974960324 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.2 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292933610149 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082921028891 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804831079385 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168432709061 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535234168927 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.