The computer is widely used in education and some people think teachers do not play an important role in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Education is an imperative element for enhancing our future. A few recent decade are witness of development in education sector. Amid this development, there is a phenomenon, that has associated with it. According to this phenomenon, computers is replaced in education segment while teacher's role has been vanished due to advancement of technology. I will try to throw light upon about its consequence related to this notion I also will try to posit my perspective about it.
To embark on, there are multifarious evidence to shore those people who are in favor of computers can not replace our traditional education methods. Firstly, the predominant reason is that computer can only render the education that are stored and programmed in the systems. It is more likely whether that technology are not able to provide answer exotic or non-standard questions. Besides, the another conspicuous element is they have limitation to observe the students. To justify, computers tend to not give attention to student's behavior in classroom. As consequence, myriad illegal actions have been accepted by students and they are part of hazardous terrorist activity such as drugs or kidnapping.
On the other side of spectrum, there is handful of reason that technology has more benefits. First and foremost, students have more changes to obtain vast knowledge in various fields. Fore example, computer is as main source where extensive information's are available at one place. Hence, they can elicit the knowledge from unfamiliar stream which lead to make productive and agile students. Secondly, technology has been expanded at the level where people/children have searched extensive material for gain profound knowledge of particular subjects through internet. In addition, pupils also use it anywhere and anytime that is attractive preponderance of computer technology.
Aggelomerating, all the points I elaborated an above that can be concluded that computer technology has vast knowledge of any field but the tradition method have not been replaced any way by technology. That is why, I supported that teacher always play a vital role in student's life as well as they also taught many other skill exempt education. Thereby, it is more fruitful in my perception about it.
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 73
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36414565826 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9943912083 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577030812325 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9986841877 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.85 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 3.4128256513 381% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130552356717 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375113576243 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398793045072 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776046363044 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018340647665 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.