Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences.
Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion
It is sometimes argued that electronic devices are being more educational, and some people think that it is the right way. However, there are those who believe that technologies are worth at school or university, and they hope that previous method of education is better. In my opinion, devices are likely to become the main feature at studying due to their lack of functions. Firstly, this essay will discuss that computers in education system is true, and secondly, it will analyze that technologies have bad characters at studying.
On the one hand, proponents of these devices believe that technologies will improve their education at school or university and I agree that this gadgets will upgrade level of education in the world. This is because we use technologies in our everyday routine or at school. As a result, a lot of schools and universities are using telephones or notebooks for their subjects. A prime example is Nazarbaev intellectual school, which uses mobile phones and computers during their study, and this school take fifth place in world rating of schools.
On the other hand, opponents of these electronics base their opinion on the assumption that cellphones have a negative effect on education. However, this argument is flawed mainly because of past education will cannot upgrade our life in future. The reason for this is that computers and telephones will damage your eyesight because of their energy on vision. For example, according to recent research, national school of physics and math have been provided with a study, where they found that technology’s energy is bad for people’s eyes and that 67 per cent of people, who participated this experiment, lost their previous vision.
In conclusion, though people may vary in their opinions, I am firmly convinced that gadgets will improve our social and communication life in other aspects. This is due to the fact that technology had improved every day, and we must use this in our everyday routine, despite computers and mobile phones are also might damage on our eyesight, and technologies take a lot of our time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | UrPrincess | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | eslamyousry | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Bakhtiyar1 | 67 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 11
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 41
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t school or university and I agree that this gadgets will upgrade level of education...
^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... education will cannot upgrade our life in future. The reason for this is that computers ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12138728324 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80863596166 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9440375174 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186419669149 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724444797579 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454792085372 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116263956585 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216636396926 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.