Computers are increasingly used in education, in which areas do you think computers are more important and in which areas are teachers more important?
With the advancement in the technology field, modern devices like computers are being made use of more and more for the purpose of education. In my point of view, while certain practical disciplines require extensive utilization of computers, the role of human teachers in the educational system cannot be neglected.
First and foremost, it is undoubtedly accurate that some subjects cannot be taught successfully without the use of computers. In subjects such as IT or computer science, excelling solely in theoretical knowledge is not as crucial as experiencing and solving realistic problems. A prominent example is coding, in which computers are fundamental tools for students to apply learnt skills on. It is completely understandable to me that computers are vital in these areas of education.
However, there are subjects in which human instructors and methodology experts are more adequate than computers. To cite an example, philosophical concepts are incredibly complicated, confounding and even sometimes based on personal perspective, which is why human teachers are necessary. Moreover, in these types of subjects, there is a great correlation between the teachers’ approach and delivery and students’ acquisition. Furthermore, in theoretical natural sciences where students need to thoroughly understand certain basic principles such as physics and chemistry, human teachers are also requisite. When studying chemistry, reactions’ mechanism, for example, is not a simple notion and includes too many variables for a programmed machine to deal with successfully. Therefore, in terms of theoretical-based subjects, the role of teachers is paramount.
In conclusion, I am convinced that in practical-based subjects such as computer science, computers need to be utilized in order to reinforce students’ learnt skills, whereas in theoretical ones, human teachers with proper pedagogical skills are indispensable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | claraa_ltn | 61 | view |
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theater between 2010 and 2012 73
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and what are the solutions 84
- People generally know that the environment is important However most individuals still don t take responsibility to protect the environment Why is this What should ben done to encourage people to protect the environment 89
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, even so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88148148148 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3898824692 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2799058171 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197386461163 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689066980315 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489338081941 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116359106734 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034200148249 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.