The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions?
Natural sources are major issue of concern in recent year. A few recent decade are witness of development in technology. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. In order to this phenomenon, natural sources has been consumpted. at an alarming rate. There are several possible reason connect to this phenomenon. Also, it has plethora of potential solutions which can be taken by government and individuals to halt this problem. I will try to throw light upon both view of natural sources. I will also try to posit my perspective about it.
To embark on, there are multifarious reason to shore those people who think that natural sources are used at extremely high rate. First and foremost, population of the globe has increased significantly today. As they are wealthier and can afford to acquire the latest technology which are run through fossil fuel such as car and some machinery need oil or gas. Thereby, people use them except thinking about its consequences. Another reason according to water is that over consumption of water despite having the profound knowledge of its extinction. They leave the tap open and doing some other work which is more likely to water war in the globe.
On the other side of spectrum, there are practical solution taken by government and person. Firstly, in term of government, they should continue campaign to raise awareness among people to use public transportation instead of private car and bike. This may result in it would halt the usage of natural sources drastically. The another main measures related to individuals that they have to follow the rules which are imposed by local authorities for betterment of future. Individuals have to gain the knowledge about effects and plant trees for rising the precipitation rate to avoid the water shortage. Last but not the least, enterprises and accommodation have use solar panel on their roof of the building which prevent the natural sources.
Aggelomerating, all the points, I elaborated an above it can be concluded that since natural sources are over utilised by dwellers and government, it led to dire situation in future. Thereby, from today, both have moral responsiblity to get a pivotal remedies to save the natural sources. Hence, it is more fruitful in my opinion.
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 84
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- If a product is sold and people buy it, then advertising is not necessary and can be considered a kind of entertainment. Do you agree or disagree with this? 73
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...n, natural sources has been consumpted. at an alarming rate. There are several pos...
^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... person. Firstly, in term of government, they should continue campaign to raise a...
^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nd government, it led to dire situation in future. Thereby, from today, both have moral r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'remedy'?
Suggestion: remedy
...ve moral responsiblity to get a pivotal remedies to save the natural sources. Hence, it ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, well, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07631578947 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8154832593 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571052631579 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6015324237 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.375 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945226862251 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267002863801 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425482671834 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527182003226 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452710546718 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.