With the availability of similar products all over the world and the opportunity to buy and use similar products, countries are becoming more alike day by day. I believe this is a positive development for the world mainly for two reasons.
Firstly, accessibility of products to people of all countries is a step towards equality. Everyone will be able to enjoy equal facilities. No country will remain behind in trends and advancements. For example, nowadays people can buy the latest technical gears from anywhere in the world as soon as they are released. As a result, even people from underdeveloped or developing country do not remain behind in technical advancements. Rather, all the country are able to relish the newest added features to the technology.
Secondly, with the development of civilization, all countries face similar problems, some countries earlier than others. So, being able to buy products that another country has already used to solve a particular problem will increase the efficiency and save time in designing and building the same product in another country. For example, if Australia has already built a particular sanitary commode that addresses the issue of water leakage. Making it available for people of Kenya, a country in the African continent, will save time and manpower in building and designing a solution to the same problem.
To conclude, accessibility of same products all over the world is a positive development as it ensures that people all over the world are enjoying equal facilities. Moreover, it saves time and manpower in building solutions to the same problems.
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 70
- The charts below show the average consumption of three nutrients by adults in the UK All of these nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 11
- The charts below show the average consumption of three nutrients by adults in the UK All of these nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 11
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21455938697 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93472584522 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4377339958 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353564487464 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110329596116 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066744016307 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216652817665 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586018779374 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.