Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Fundamentally, it is invalid to achieve economic success by lengthening working time. Many people consider the main impetus of high GDP growth is that workers keep manufacturing goods and providing services as long as possible. In fact, however, domestic consumption may play a more essential role in this matter. According to a research conducted by economists, countries whose people do not consume products and services in short time usually suffer from economic crisis, because companies and factories cannot earn their money back to maintain production or invest on new projects. Therefore, based on the reality that the longer working time people have, the less time and motivation they will go outside to patronize local businesses, such assertion is probably not as effective as supporters of having a long average working time anticipate.
Another reasons why a long average working time will not promise successful economy is that these countries will finally find themselves lacking enough competent workers to develop. In modern world, the economic success of a country depends on whether it has sufficient skilled labour force to develop science and technology. It is not difficult for us to notice that mechanization gradually replace handwork, which even people with little education are competent to deal with, and countries whose workforce lacks expertise or good education are very likely to undergo high unemployment rate, not to mention developing economy. Therefore, considering the fact that a long average working time will deprive people of time to improve themselves or educate their children, such assertion is unconvincing.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, in fact, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51181102362 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8695359326 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633858267717 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8376019569 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.555555556 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379000209819 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14435348885 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833474860168 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294680142727 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242346918341 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, in fact, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51181102362 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8695359326 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633858267717 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8376019569 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.555555556 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379000209819 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14435348885 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833474860168 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294680142727 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242346918341 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.