A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether training for practical jobs or higher education in university should be invested by government. While I accept that hand-on experiences brings several merits to people, I still believe that learning on universities is also crucial.
On the one hand, there are a lot of beneficial effects of practical experiences. To commence with, thanks to the training in specialization, students can have a clearer perspective about what they will do in the future, consequently, have cleare goals and aspiration. Rather than learning theoriacal knowledge which perhaps contains numerous abstract concepts, concentration on gaining hand-on trainings can help people prevent watse of time on subjects which is not related to their specialization. Therefore, they can have more experiences in their field of career leading to reduced unemployment rate. Many research studies have shown that, the unemployment rate in recent years have increased, especially with students who just fresh out of college with little experiences.
On the other hand, university education is also essential for personal development, leading to the success in the future. Firstly, having higher education in university with a larger range of knowledge can contribute to the flexibility in changing career in the future. In this period of time, individuals can expose with several subjects they have never explored before, which can shape their career path in the future. In addition, unviversity also equip students with crucial skills for their development, such as problem-solving, teamwork, …. Moreover, exposing with a wide range of knowledge, meeting people from diverse cultures not only broaden people’s knowledge but also teach them how to gather information and make informed decisions independently and correctly.
In conclusion, while it is true that having hand-on work trainings can bring several beneficial impacts on people, learning university is likely more crucial for numerous reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Trang Hạnh | 80 | view |
- Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 84
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives Therefore it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... changing career in the future. In this period of time, individuals can expose with several su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6821192053 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03739684122 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8638963402 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157530165896 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633323493807 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619903331309 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115879212051 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417705553452 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.