Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some statements said that we need more expenditure on skills and vocational training for practical work than university education. From my perspective view, there are two main reasons that convince me to agree with that.
Firstly, many universities now get their student after graduation and have to face the unemployment problem. Although those students received a good degree, almost companies require workers with practical experience but not their achievement in education, so it is hard for youngsters to find a suitable job. Having a high degree does not go with owning needed skills for work. For instance, so many people with master's degrees only work at home or even have a job but it is not profitable with their knowledge
Secondly, spending on vocational schooling not only costs less than a university education but also provides people with suitable skills for their work fields. Training in vocational education only focuses on the job that they want to do, for that reason, learners can receive as much knowledge as they need in their tasks. This method might suitable for a great number of the family which has low income. Take bartenders as an example, they can work effectively with their experience even though they do not have to pass any university. Furthermore, they can also take advance of their predecessors in learning necessary skills.
All things considered, depending on almost industry requirements these days, a crucial skill for practical work is needed, so having a decision in vocational training is better than a university education. This also helps some people to save money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Trang Hạnh | 80 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 56
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 73
- In many countries the governments like to spend more money on the arts Some people agree with this However others think government should spend more on health and education Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17938931298 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77886973597 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0604306644 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.083333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269928006153 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100952283864 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938267579808 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188214012524 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620620113823 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.