Criminals should be judged according to their personal circumstances rather than making them receive a fixed punishment. Do you agree or disagree?
In many situations, apart from noticeable testaments, there are always hidden motives for the mechanism of actions and so do criminal cases. Therefore, many concur that criminals should be convicted properly based on their own motives rather than following the unwritten rules. Personally, I root for this opinion in terms of morality.
First and foremost, scientifically speaking, many criminals’ behavior deeply-root from experiences in their past. After researching on many murderers, a group of worldwide professionals has come to the conclusion of the massive factor of traumas or parental behavior on the likelihood of crime committed in adulthood. In the renowned series called Hannibal, the serial killer in that series was traumatized and haunted by the brutal and unethical death of his parents and his sisters which then led to immoral cannibalism in his adulthood. Therefore, provided that the behavior of the criminals is also manipulated by their childhood and adolescents, the authority should concern about each criminals’ situation to convict a suitable punishment.
Moreover, regardless of any situation, this also helps the judgment in giving out the necessary punishment to the immoral criminals. For instance, in the 21st century, there was stunning news of a child sexual abuse case that happened in Korea. After sexually assaulting the little girl, the abuser was arrested and only received a 12-year sentence. The law about sexual assault in Korea at that time was not considered as serious as other crimes, hence, although having completely destroyed the future of the little girl and having caused chronically mental and physical trauma to the victim, the criminal has been freed in 2021 after serving a 12-year prison in the rage of Korean people in particular and the whole world as a whole. Thus, needless to say, convicting criminals based on their situations surely outweigh the fixed program.
In conclusion, I totally advocate the suggesting method of handling convictions to criminals as both showing moralities and also putting proper punishment to the right evil.
- Do the advantages of having one world government outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe government should be in charge of this while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays some parents put a lot of pressure on their children Why is the reason for doing that Is this a positive or negative development for the children 61
- discuss the pros and cons of learning foreign language 78
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In many situations, apart from noticeabl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or this opinion in terms of morality. First and foremost, scientifically speak...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to convict a suitable punishment. Moreover, regardless of any situation, t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns surely outweigh the fixed program. In conclusion, I totally advocate the su...
^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng proper punishment to the right evil.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42987804878 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92125835417 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612804878049 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2440616184 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154487698549 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539083501959 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576527760995 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893461027633 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391455611757 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.