Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
It is widely argued that cycling is more environmentally friendly in comparison with other means of transportation, but it is not popular in many places. There are several factors leading to this and some feasible measures should be taken to improve the usage of bicycles.
To begin with, there are some reasons why people prefer using other motor vehicles such as cars or motorcycles. Firstly, compared to other means of transportation, cycling is physically demanding, especially in the long distance. For example, not many people choose to travel by bicycles in tropical countries where the weather is very hot and humid. In addition, nowadays people have a hectic lifestyle and consequently they try to save time as much as possible. With faster speed, cars and motorcycles are more efficient to travel than bicycles.
However, some actions could be used to solve this problem. The first solution would be to apply a higher tax on motor vehicles. People will be reluctant to use cars or motorcycles if they have to pay a considerable amount of money for using these vehicles. As a result, they will gradually switch to bicycles which are much more affordable. Secondly, improving the infrastructure for cycling can help people use bicycles more efficiently as well as improve the safety of cycling. For example, the government should build more new roads which are only used for bicycles.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular in many places because of some reasons and solutions should be produced soon to tackle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | Linh Nguyen Khanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jenny_6902 | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | hxyav | 61 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 74
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 73
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0873015873 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84729342868 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9519602861 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5714285714 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185751340468 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652265055694 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908098485346 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139939200078 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706757640568 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.