The demand for food is increasing worldwide. What are the causes? What measures could the international community take in order to improve the situation?
Food consumption is witnessing a significantly arising demand across the globe. There are some factors involved in this phenomenon and the joint effort from the global population could alleviate the situation by several initiatives.
There are a variety of explanations for this trend, chief of which is that the booming population has entailed the scarcity of food in some particular regions. Overpopulation is primarily prevalent in some countries such as China and India, in which the dense population, up to a billion people, has resulted in the more mouths to feed while the supply chains are unable to equate the birth rates, leading to the disparities in the food demand and the production systems. Furthermore, its consumption varies in accordance with people’s purposes, and betterment in the living standards allow them to relish a full-filled life. Food is now on the demand of higher quality ingredients as well as flavor in order to gratify taste buds and nasal passages of the affluent. Not only the rich but also the general public has acknowledged the magnitude of fresh-and-nutritious food, leading to the overall growing demand around the world.
However, in an endeavor to ameliorate the existing phenomenon, steps could be taken immediately. First, governments should cooperate with private sectors to have more policies that benefit the business and expand the production scales. Once the supply chains are efficient, it will meet the demand of the market within a firm, resulting in a better free market capitalist model that gradually surmount the scarcity of food. Additionally, there should be campaigns in order to raise public awareness of not wasting food for non-essential occasions and gatherings, especially when the socioeconomic status is poor. This will help people both to save their budget for other living aspects and in turn, make them treasure the current lives when food is still widely available.
To conclude, there are some reasons behind the increasing demand for food. Nonetheless, governmental bodies should enact relevant legislation to facilitate businesses activities in tandem with educating the public to deliver tangible betterment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-18 | Nguyễn Quang Huy | 89 | view |
2022-02-03 | sonnn | 89 | view |
- Many parents choose to teach their children at home instead of sending them to school Do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh its disadvantages 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ffluent. Not only the rich but also the general public has acknowledged the magnitude of fresh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44574780059 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02877330291 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595307917889 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4823009102 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175300280343 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619667863675 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511067071869 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107298293188 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00368131290999 0.056905535591 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.