Research shows that consumers are less and less influenced by tv and newspaper advertisements than in the past. Why is this happening? Is it a positive or negative development?
Statistically, people are initially more cautious with advertisements shown in television and newspaper, compared with the previous time. While the reasons for this development are varied, I contend this is a positive one for the change in consumption behavior it brings about as well as the costs it saves for people.
As the indication is made, people are less swayed by advertisements is attributable to some justifications. First, the acknowledgement of the general public about wise consumption has been enhanced. Along with the growth of endorsement, the concern of a market in which legitimate sellers are blended with other scammers also rises. Consumers in the center of the chaos have gained more experience through their trades; and with the spread of the official current affair provided by the government, many residents in rural areas have been internalized about knowledge and cautions in their daily buy-and-sell activities. Second, while advertisement bombardments allow the creators to gain more profit through its approach, it accidentally makes the advertisement itself become pervasive with the customers. Therefore, people tend to lose interest in such a common way of marketing and the expenditure for those products decrease proportionally.
The trend is fervently a positive transformation among customers. To begin with, those whose consumption behaviors are incompatible with their financial capabilities would stabilize their budget more carefully. This helps reduce the costs that families or individuals have to bear as some of them presumably used to spend for trivialities and in turn, could save them a certain amount for other categories. Additionally, to teenagers, early consciousness about consumption may spark a good behavior for their future selves and family as they grow and show concerns for their choices fastidiously.
In conclusion, there are some motives behind the given change and social progress is indeed the prime catalyst for this. Nonetheless, this is a positive one and the beneficiaries are wise consumers
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
- To succeed in business one needs to know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup etc Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do you 84
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup etc Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do you 92
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ions. First, the acknowledgement of the general public about wise consumption has been enhance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60191082803 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24158300209 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0209964283 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110129029053 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437273514029 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479501018354 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770687077352 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286604479174 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.