Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup etc. Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The trend towards allocating resources for professional athletes in many countries has sparked conflicting opinions. While this is beneficial to national reputation, I completely agree that it should be better spent for the general public for some reasons.
On the one hand, it is reasonable to invest heavily in ambitious and prospective sports competitors for participating in international tournaments. Considering the costs of hiring foreign trainers and health care specialists, it requires a sufficient government budget to cover all aspects and areas of sports. This is deemed an intrinsic motivation, given the best conditions to nurture talents and high-quality equipment to practice sporting activities and those who are well-taken care by the state could be offered more opportunities to win a championship and bring glory for the nation. Hence, players who reach the pinnacle of sport could reinforce the reputation of a country by upholding their ranking in the global sports chart.
On the other hand, it is more justified for the governmental bodies to draw the attention on incentivizing sporting pursuit among the youth. Once the provision of sports facilities is executed, it could directly raise public awareness and allow youngsters to adopt a fitness regime, which is essential to one’s physique development. Furthermore, teaching programmes in which sports are integrated will enhance students' physical health, establishing an ideal balance between school schedule and outdoor activities, freeing them from the daily academic pressure. As a result, youngsters’ strengthened physical well-being will structure a solid society since they contribute largely to national productivity and societal function.
To conclude, the investment in professional sportsmen is essential. Nonetheless, the youths’ sporting spirit should be held in higher esteem and require additional attention in order to ensure their holistic development.
- In the past most people worked for small businesses while more people now work for large businesses What are the advantages and disadvantages of working for large businesses 84
- Tomorrow is the most important thing in our life However some people think that the present time is more important How important is it for individuals and the country to think and do something for the future What is your own opinion 84
- Scientists believe that by studying the behavior of 3 years old children people can predict if that child can become a criminal in the future To what extent is crime a product of human nature Is it possible to stop children from growing to be a criminal 89
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write Why is this What measures can governments take to solve these problems 11
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... that it should be better spent for the general public for some reasons. On the one hand, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... practice sporting activities and those who are well-taken care by the state could be o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84320557491 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20217210696 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662020905923 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5388203202 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103060098677 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371608430897 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305283789868 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568237519558 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020287380838 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... that it should be better spent for the general public for some reasons. On the one hand, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... practice sporting activities and those who are well-taken care by the state could be o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84320557491 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20217210696 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662020905923 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5388203202 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103060098677 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371608430897 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305283789868 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568237519558 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020287380838 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.