Many parents choose to teach their children at home instead of sending them to school. Do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh the advantages of the other?
The option of rearing children domestically instead of entrusting child care responsibility to educational institutions has been widely adopted by parents. Notwithstanding the merits that kids derive from familial bonds, I believe it is overshadowed by that of the other.
For one thing, kids who are educated under the supervision and guidance of their relatives are those who shoulder the future career that the previous generations have developed. Parents who decide to let their offspring study at home often engage in part-time jobs, in order to provide full-time instruction for them. In such conditions, children will perceive experience and are more likely to be led in the way in which their parents have embarked. This individual-based teaching method is considerably advantageous and significant for those who are going to inherit traditional domestic property, which is the career path that passed down within generations merely. As a result, they will acquire a good grasp of conducting family business autonomously by combining unique knowledge into practice in the real-world market.
For another, I believe that the teaching method above has some limitations in the general contexts and children should be admitted to school for holistic development. One thing considered, attending conventional classes offer a sense of belonging to the community for students. Within a firm, being involved in group activities or exchanging ideas with peers will cultivate teamwork skills and critical thinking for children, given the opportunities for monitoring group operation and debate against others to trigger misunderstandings and reach an unanimous decision. Furthermore, formal education systems are deemed justified for the majority of learners considering both cognition and physique development with reasonable syllabus that include sporting activities and academic curriculum. For this reason, students are inclined to be well-rounded rather than focus on any particular aspects in their growth and thus have more prospects for future career.
To conclude, the option to nurture children in a domestic environment is not effective in the abstract. The benefits they derive from a holistic education setting undoubtedly outweighed the merits of the aforementioned.
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums 78
- To succeed in business one needs to know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Research shows that consumers are less and less influenced by tv and newspaper advertisements than in the past Why is this happening Is it a positive or negative development 96
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on different factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The values that we learn from our parents and family have a greater influence on our future success than knowledge and skills we learn from school To what extent do you agree or disagree 14
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... to trigger misunderstandings and reach an unanimous decision. Furthermore, formal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, well, as a result, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75516224189 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17867379154 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2660269903 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.357142857 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15387361257 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484266030304 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374502713553 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859944645803 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219654765641 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.