Developed countries often give financial aid to developing countries, but it does not solve poverty so developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. Do you agree or disagree?
It is suggested that instead of providing financial support to poorer countries because it is an ineffective way to help them get rid of poverty, wealthy countries should offer other types of help. Personally, I totally agree with this view and I also believe that educational and infrastructural support is far more important than financial ones.
On the one hand, the major reason that education is a key factor, helping poor countries to escape from poverty is that they are able to learn various subjects. These, such as mathematics or science, in the long run, would help them to find a decent job and earn a living. This is illustrated by the fact that the US governments often send professionals or well-qualified teachers to Venezuela in order to help the local people to study schooling subjects. Therefore, people, living in this country, have become more well-educated and successfully enjoyed a more decent standard of living.
Furthermore, alongside education, I also believe that the development of infrastructure is equally important when helping poor countries. This is because the majority of people living in difficult circumstances tend to be homeless or unemployed. However, if infrastructures, for example, housing areas or transport system, are built, they will remarkably benefit people. For instance, Cambodian governments have collaborated with famous Chinese architects for decades to construct housing projects, subway, and modern buildings to not only provide various accommodation but also job’s opportunities for the local people.
In conclusion, although some countries tend to spend their budget to support poor countries, I believe that the mentioned solutions including the development of the education system and infrastructure would have a better impact on these countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Mr.Strange | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | Ravipatel7233 | 82 | view |
- In some countries young people are living in richer and healthier condition but less happy What are the reasons What might be done to solve this issue 81
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 84
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations rather than the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...tics or science, in the long run, would help them to find a decent job and earn a living. This is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56834532374 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21272765167 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7014857139 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.727272727 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202410487407 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707992719672 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762060189978 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127189763046 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667188728253 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.