In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Today, it is believed that adolescents in remote areas are in lack of accessibility to the field of education. Some are in favor of educational experts and institutes provision while others prefer modern technology such as computers and Internet access. This essay will discuss both views followed by my own stance.
On the one hand, applying technological incorporation should be prioritized in terms of knowledge and convenience. In detail, thanks to the invention of the Internet, learners nowadays are capable of pursuing their favorable courses through distant learning. Furthermore, regard to geographical adversities, keeping up-to-the-minute with the latest information via social media is no more a fantasy. In addition, the computer is such an efficient platform for self-studying, which not only supports users in acquiring digital literacy but also enhances their employment prospects in the future.
On the other hand, turning to the traditional teaching methodology, schooling is said to be the greatest environment for human interaction. At school, students are friendly encouraged to get involved in order to reinforce motivation. Besides, teachers will have an opportunity to thoroughly sympathize with the background of each individual. As a result, they are likely to leverage students by choosing a relevant method such as peer-pressure, tutoring and so on. In my own point of view, this method outweighs the other due to its economy and effectiveness.
In conclusion, solving the obstacle of children having less access to education can be tackled by different solutions. Still, school construction with teacher employment is more plausible and beneficial when coming to reality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | nguyen thuy an2309 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ali_mohammadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Legendmaker | 100 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and beneficial when coming to reality.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63813229572 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28971241218 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688715953307 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0200613196 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197590825134 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579718550927 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747555819867 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120518201298 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768104734831 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.