Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Scientific and technological advancements have had a negative impact on the environment. While some people rely on technology to solve this issue, I agree with those who argue that a modest lifestyle is a more superior way to save the environment.
On the one hand, counting on the technology to prevent pollution is more advantageous to some extent. Sophisticated machines can have the power to clean the environment at a faster pace. For instance, the water bodies in residential areas are contaminated due to unprocessed waste from factories, citizens would use the water purifying equipments to clear the river streams in a flash. Furthemore, various forms of renewable energy can now be obtained by modern machines such as solar, water, and wind energy. This will alleviate the exhaust fumes to the atmosphere from overusing traditional sources like coal or gas.
On the other hand, a minimal lifestyle would benefit the environment more greatly. Particularly, instead of purchasing toxic chemicals and industrial cleansers to wash clothes or clean the house, households can create their own cleansing liquid from citrus fruits and vinegar. This not only reduces waste to the local areas but also does not destroy our health due to close contact to toxic ingredients. Additionally, living simply is safer for the surroundings in the long-run. As machines will surely be out of order and their frames might be dumped in natural places, reliance on technology would hurt the environment more deeply.
Ultimately, although science offers some conveniences, I believe that a basic lifestyle is a wiser choice to save nature.
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 78
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27307692308 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98826848203 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4692600033 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202891595968 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654807261662 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630865324848 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126990029335 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076631166633 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.