Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organizations say that in the global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent. What are your views?
It has been far more normal that large organizations offer much more favorable compensation packages for top executives than subordinate staff with respect to hiring and retaining the best decent management teams for their companies. From my perspective, it is definitely justifiable and this essay would elaborate on this topic.
To commence with, managers of large corporations deserve to receive higher remuneration than junior staff because of the immense pressure of such positions they have to suffer. To be more specific, it is the directors, not anyone else, that run the organizations, carefully take consideration among imperative business plans, and are responsible for any failure resulting from their orientation. Besides, they are always on the lookout for innovative ideas and implement those ideas so that contribute to the wealth and long-term development of organizations. For instance, chief financial officers always have to bury themselves in financial reports and come up with significant financial strategies in order to ensure the financial wealth of companies and make business more lucrative. Due to the significant roles that senior managers play in companies, and the heavy workload they endure, being paid better salaries is one of the roots of motivation for them.
Secondly, as senior managers are likely to compare the benefits of other companies before taking the decision of choosing and contributing to which organization, offering attractive incentives is an effective way that most companies would utilize to captivate talent managers who will help business owners not only maintain but also scale up their businesses. It is crystal clear that the skills and knowledge required to be able to occupy such management positions are earned with several years of experience and management degrees, both of which are the results of constant perseverance and involve both time and money. For that reason, candidates applying to the board of directors completely have the right to demand a rate of compensation that is commensurate with their effort and talent and choose the best working environment for them. For example, supply chain management positions not only required a leader with comprehensive advanced knowledge about the whole supply chain fields both theoretically and practically but also expect a leader with qualified management skills and a creative mindset in order to optimize the supply chain operation of manufacturers. In the meanwhile, to meet these requirements, a leader must have undergone many years of experience in many parts of the supply chain, spend time and money even study abroad to obtain advanced knowledge of this domain.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the method of attracting skillful people by giving bigger salaries to directors is a successful management strategy. Not only does it stimulate the employees to work most efficiently, but also finds talented individuals who deserve their financial status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
- Is free trade good or bad 80
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
- Although more and more people read the news on internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2532.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50434782609 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00462781052 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7800398193 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.857142857 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153565004593 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543989892474 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447655029122 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102093446395 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028372327827 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.