Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before?
it is argued that the increasing availability of modern devices has provided us with a greater amount of relaxation than we could have in the past. Although technological advancements have certain negative impact on us, overall they have been of great assistance to our work and life.
it is apparent that recent innovations have expanded human leisure via creating more options for entertainment and recreational activities. For instance, the mass-production of personal computers has significantly lowered the prices and allowed us to engage in various leisure pursuits, such as streaming movies or playing video games with others across the world, and connecting with friends via social platforms instantly. Therefore, the scope of leisure activities has been broadened by advancements in technology to an extent that was unimaginable in the past. Another benefit of technological development is improved efficiency and time-saving capabilities. Such advancements have automated many mundane tasks, thereby reducing the time required to complete the. For example, the invention of dishwashers and washing machines has decreased time for household chores. The ease of communication through instant messaging has also streamlined business process, enabling employees to complete tasks more efficiently, freeing up more leisure time.
Despite such advantages, new technologies can also blur the boundaries between work and personal life. With constant connectivity provided by phones and the internet, some are struggling to disconnect from work obligations even during their supposed leisure time. One results of this is people are deprived of their genuine relaxing moments and consequently, technologies are contributing to their increased stress. As a result, it not an overstatement that smart devices have inadvertently impacted the quality of our relaxation time. However, this problem is not prevalent as generally, labor law can ensure workers to fully enjoy their time off.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that while the proliferation of new technologies helps many to manage their working time and accommodate personal needs more efficiently, some are in a struggle to handle more tasks in daily lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Important historical objects in museums around the world should be returned to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- University students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Ohers however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety 84
- Today people are wasting large amounts of food Why What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted 95
- Some people believe that handwriting is no longer useful in the modern world and should not be taught in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that the increasing availabil...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eat assistance to our work and life. it is apparent that recent innovations hav...
^^
Line 3, column 764, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... reducing the time required to complete the. For example, the invention of dishwashe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74545454545 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19322055047 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60303030303 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6828161664 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236901204984 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745920793684 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352851720718 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136476101891 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338990470641 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.