The World of Work Is Rapidly Changing and Employees Cannot Depend On Having the Same Work or The Same Working Conditions for Life.
What Are the Causes and Ways to Prepare People to Work in The Future?
As the job market has become increasingly erratic, employees have to learn to handle such phenomenon rather than be committed to only one job or the same working environment into their old age. The main reasons behind this include the rise of technology and globalization, and to address such changes, one needs to regularly increase their employability and be ready to seize new opportunities.
Apparently, the advances in Intelligent technology and robotics, such as learning machines, has transformed many industries in terms of productivity. Now many manual jobs - such assembling car components - that were once performed by humans have been made automated. While such shift has significantly increased the output, it has also led to a higher level of joblessness. Furthermore, the spread of globalization allows multinational organizations to have some of their work outsourced to developing countries where the labor costs are relatively low. This development has helped these corporations remain price competitive but concomitantly meant heavy redundancies.
To be well-prepared for such seismic changes, one should adopt a range of strategies. First and foremost, education and training should be viewed as a lifelong process. Only by embracing this mindset, will one be eager to seek not only new opportunities to upskill and learn new technologies but also mentorship or informal education. This approach could enable a person to become upwardly mobile and remain unaffected by downsizing. More importantly, it is vital to inculcate a sense of entrepreneurship and adaptability into workers, as these qualities help them to identify business opportunities and learn how to take calculated risks. Although one might feel exhausted in continually finding new clients or projects, they will likely be prepared to pivot as the job market demands and be independent.
In conclusion, the evolving nature of today’s today workforce is being driven mainly by innovative technology and low-cost labor, and therefore the best way to be employable is to upgrade oneself with new skills and knowledge, and learn how to be financially independent as well as adaptable
- Some people believe that new buildings should be built in traditional styles To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- only the government action can solve housing shortages in big cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- One long distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years time but they cause the same amount of pollution So some people think that we should discourage non essential flights such as tourist travel rather than to limit the use of cars To w 89
- Some people believe that young people should choose the jobs that they want but other people think they should be more realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53753753754 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3113480062 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627627627628 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5680464357 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821099406551 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273455218739 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484583001125 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517990883275 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373285535558 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.