Some people say that it is acceptable to test medicine intended for people on animals. Others, however believe that it is not right to use animals in this research?
Dicuss both views and give your own opinion?
Many consider it normal for people to use animals for clinical trials, while others believe it is morally wrong to use animals for medical research. Personally, although animal testing is decidedly immoral, it plays an essential role in devising new drugs.
On the one hand, detractors of animal testing often point out that animals have rights. Such notion is predicated on the idea that animals have consciousness and feelings which are features that a human also possesses. Moreover, using animals for medical assessments means inflicting pain and its attendant aversive mental states on them, like anxiety or depression. Therefore, it is unethical to witness a creature with some similar features of humans to suffer a clinical trail or even die an agonizing death, should the test fail. This is undeniably unjustifiable, especially regarding tests in non-essential medical fields like cosmetics.
On the other hand, animal sacrifice for scientific advancement is critically necessary for the wellness of humans. As a matter of fact, a newly-devised drug is too risky to be tested on a human even though the consent is obtained. More importantly, some animal species, such as rats, have great similarities in genetic structures with humans. As a result, if tests for newly-found vaccines are conducted on these species, then pharamceutical companies can warrant the vaccines’ use before mass-producing. This means countless human lives will be saved to an extent that it would be impossible if scientists were working under the moral constraints of human test subjects. It is true that causing pains to a living creature is unacceptable from an animal activist’s perspective, however; its contribution to the stability of a society is well-justified.
In conclusion, while more ethical alternatives to animal testing are still under development, the best way to make breakthroughts in medicine is making use of laboratory animals.
- Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Nowadays experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 93
- Keeping animals in the zoo is the best way to protect wild animals Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 61
- some people believe that governments should make laws about people s nutrition and food choice while others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'assessments'' or 'assessment's'?
Suggestion: assessments'; assessment's
...es. Moreover, using animals for medical assessments means inflicting pain and its attendant...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45695364238 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17225455828 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605960264901 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5959180859 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287313300861 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963827986113 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765279220988 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18504715468 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773721907206 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.