Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn’t be encouraged among students. Do you agree or disagree with this idea?
Nowadays, volunteer work has been considered as an integral part of many students’ life, whereas, it is sometimes claimed that students should not squander their time on doing these activities which may have negative effect on their academic results. Nonetheless, I totally believe that volunteer work ought to be encouraged in students due to its potential benefits.
To commence with, there is no denying that volunteer work is an indispensable extracurricular activity in school with the aim of helping foster independence and imparting the ability to deal with different situations, unexpected incidences. This can make students become much more mature and self-reliant. In addition, another noteworthy point is that doing volunteer work can help students develop jobs skills for the future. By means of taking part in volunteer work, students can gain a lot of hands – on experience along with many momentous soft skills including communications, teamwork, or creativity. Volunteering provides students an exposure to the real world and a golden chance to develop their skills, which definitely can boost their CV and supply a better job prospects.
Furthermore, it is apparent that doing volunteer work is an efficacious way to make a contribution to the society. In spite of the young age, volunteer work makes it possible for students to fulfill their obligations to pay back to the society, make a difference and change the environment around in a proactive way. This plays a crucial role in the cognitive development of students, which can help diminish the enormous number of criminals and social evils each year. Therefore, not only does it make students instill their consciousness of the community but it also exerts a positive impact on the development of the society.
In summary, I strongly believe that engaging in unpaid work needs to be stimulated in students owing to its benefits to both individuals and society as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write 80
- Professional sports people are often idolised by young children. Some people think that they, therefore, have a responsibility to be good role models at all times for children. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- In some countries the difference in the age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn t be encouraged among students Do you agree or disagree with this idea 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proactive way" with adverb for "proactive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rence and change the environment around in a proactive way. This plays a crucial role in the cogni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pact on the development of the society. In summary, I strongly believe that enga...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, in addition, in summary, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28525641026 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06996408565 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2454144718 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.416666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210238994649 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825929331493 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050676515311 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125193175334 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478476995281 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.