Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments. To what exent do you agree or disagree.
It would be argued that the first stage of technological inventions gave people more chances to convert their lives than contemporary inventions. I do not totally agree with this opinion.
First of all, It is certainly true that early technology changed people lives so much. These developments allowed people to do what they never thought that they can do before. It was considered as a magic in the late century. For an example, the development of printing had a huge impact on publishing. Instead of copying by hand which need several days to complete, the performance of printer help organizations, people save their time as well as the cost for employees. It also would be more beneficial for readers to approach books, newspapers and documents easily. Another significant invention I want to mention here is the telephone. Telephone was revolutionised communication. It is possible for people from different regions as well as nations to keep in touch with each other. Thus, early technological developments definitely changed their lives.
On the other hand, while I accept that early technological inventions convert people lives into another age of technology, however, it is not mean that I agree that the first stage of technology has greater effect than the recent developments. There are many current digital services replacing the older inventions. For instance, all people can see that cell phones virtually take place of telephones because of its portable and convenience. The cell phones now were improved so much to totally change the way people communicate and set up a new habit that is bringing phone everywhere. Another evidence is social media, such as Facebook, instagram, twitter. These apps connect not only millions of people but also billions of population all over the world. Modern life seems to be easier than ever.
In conclusion, people can say that early technological developments created an important foundation of recent developments but than cannot compare the rate of impact of both on the society, it is not fair.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | bminhanh01 | 84 | view |
- In today’s world of science and technology, we still greatly value our artists suchas musician, writers, painters. What can arts tell us about that science and technology cannot? 89
- In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 89
- Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefits that it will replace face-to-face education soon. Others say that traditional education is irreplaced.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in diffirent countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development? 67
- Many people say that family is the most powerful influence on a child’s development. However, some people suppose that other factors (such as music, friends,…) have a great influence on children.” Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20180722892 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96491281706 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.789845696 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.35 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365569103358 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884262143575 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904173447815 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220854448406 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307191204405 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.