Employers should give long holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree or disagree?
In today's modern world, the extremely competitive working environment has led many employees reducing the number of holidays of their employees. Although, there is an alternative opinion that longer holidays can make the employees better in their working tasks. Personally, I strongly agree with this statement and this essay will discuss several reasons explaining my opinion.
To begin, it is evident that employees who have frequent vacations are more productive. In contrast with those who work almost constantly, they have the chance and the opportunity given by their employers to recharge their batteries. Thus, when they are back this huge amount of energy, which was saved during these relaxing days, can be given to their work. Several researches in the USA, even before 2000 have shown the massive difference in productivity amongst relaxed and non-relaxed employees. Thus, companies and organizations should give more holidays to their employees.
It can be argued that a big absence from work actually prevents the employees to be more active in their return. However, the vast majority of them who deeply love their jobs do not usually agree with this view. On the other hand, they consider bigger in length holidays as a reward for their hard job. So, longer holidays means more satisfied and more grateful and of course employees with even bigger desire to work well in their return.
To conclude, several discussions have been made about the way that holidays affect employees. From my perspective, only beneficial outcomes can be seen by longer holidays given by companies.
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In order to find a good job, people should have a university degree.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 78
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community; instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and i 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... number of holidays of their employees. Although, there is an alternative opinion that l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...quent vacations are more productive. In contrast with those who work almost constantly, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
... view. On the other hand, they consider bigger in length holidays as a reward for their hard job...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by longer holidays given by companies.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, thus, well, in contrast, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2862745098 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64304415965 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7936753604 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240506731789 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848552626235 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631497251794 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134224703557 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692243289934 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.