Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals ass individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree
A good environment plays an essential role in our life. But it is often argued that protect the environment is only the mission of politicians not residents. I strongly disagree with this opinion.
On the one hand, the government plays an essential role to prevent the threat of environmental problems such as introduce laws, impose taxes, etc. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Although, individuals can do too little, more people will make a big effect on the planet. As it cannot be denied that each citizen was partly contributed to making environmental problems, for example, the emission from factories, daily basic trash, smoke from transport. Therefore, they are responsible for acting to help the community. Research has found that environmental status like global warming, degradation, declining significantly of endangered animals, which accounts for 80% of human beings.
On the other hand, politicians cannot manage the large whole area. They might find it difficult to opt for polluted issues in small places. Furthermore, the more people take their awareness of protecting the environment, the more efficient measures will make. Moreover, if everyone takes their protection, it will build community-awareness, which makes the earth better. Singapore, for instance, has been succeeded in becoming one of the greatest countries due to the awareness of individuals, so that everyone who visits this country has the responsibility of preserving the background without reminding them.
In conclusion, politicians must play their part as significantly as individuals in environmental protection.
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it positive or negative development 73
- birthday
- Currently deforestation is one of major concerns for global warning For instance an urban area without trees and plants surrounding will be impacted by pollutions and hazardous chemical To what extend do you agree OR disagree 61
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job whereas others advocate changing a job from time to time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58064516129 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27097410447 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661290322581 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5131967109 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169230376734 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516178361816 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625205272401 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105455897976 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451058546222 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58064516129 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27097410447 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661290322581 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5131967109 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169230376734 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516178361816 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625205272401 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105455897976 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451058546222 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.