Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is an increasing trend in extinction of languages every year in the present context. Some people opine that it is simpler with minimum languages. I personally strongly disagree with the given context. This essay will shed the lights on importance of languages to human civilization.
Primarily, languages are the means of communication and more importantly they reflect the identity of specific culture, tradition and lifestyle. The language helps us distinguish someone of ones kind in the crowed world, both geographically and psychologically. These are the true reflection of cultural diversity. According to the report BBC Nepal, Nepal altogether possesses more than 80 indigenous languages of which 20 languages are in the verse of extinction. In this regards, youths are being conscious to protect their languages through organizations of various cultural functions.
Secondly, the languages are also the connecting link between the past and the present living. The variation in languages among the community depicts a clear picture of the ancient lifestyle and are considered to be the greatest source for anthropologists. Today, the human civilization has come far beyond, but still the call for history is a result of the languages which are prevalent till date. Likewise, many of the scientific advancement at present are the result of ancient writing. This can be clearly depicted by the ancient <i>beda</i>, which were written in Sanskrit and explains the path to successful living and a secret to scientific inventions.
In contrast, the fewer languages in the world in no way make the living easier. The monolingual society with no differentiation among themselves in terms of origin or culture would heavily confuse and lead to conflict. Also this would be no easier in terms of acclimatization, a hurdle among the existence of language, since the language to follow would surely be perceived to be superior.
To sum up, languages are connecting link between the past and future in addition to the precursor of development and discipline of living.
- The graph below gives the information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many government think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think that new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss an 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...anguage helps us distinguish someone of ones kind in the crowed world, both geograph...
^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ages are in the verse of extinction. In this regards, youths are being conscious to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d heavily confuse and lead to conflict. Also this would be no easier in terms of acc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, still, in addition, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39263803681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13836513044 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5336152751 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302005229384 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088295987089 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572923597873 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155669008614 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776779049085 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.