Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint?
Incontrovertibly, giving a hand to other members of community irrespective of their age and gender praised in all corner of the word. In such a context, it is suggested that people allocate some of their emolument to humanitarian actions and charities. I am inclined to aver that, this policy could bring invaluable results not only for the destitute members but also for the affluent people.
It is claimed that donating a sum of one's salary to benevolent organizations could boost the welfare of vulnerable citizens provided that the fund spends wisely. To be more precise, if the public donates a fixed amount of their income to charities, they have to acquire that only impoverished people gain the advantage of their help neither charity nor administrative system. Furthermore, if basic accommodation will be provided for low-income citizens by the support of wealthier people it may contribute to strengthening the bond among all people irrespective of their financial condition. In addition to this, some charities could hold special vocational courses for unskilled and poor people enhancing their abilities which could contribute to finding a better career and raise their living standard. Last but not least on this side of the debate is the fact that by supporting charities and consequently needy people, the supporters would take pride in themselves and feel valued and appreciated.
On the other hand, it is asserted that there is a danger of misusing the money for other purposes and not the real people who severely need this assistance. Nevertheless, it may be true to say this but this issue could be addressed efficiently by imposing right laws to deter misuse and maintaining charities by various organizations and controlling their work consistently.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks it is crystal clear that supporting charities financially will bring a multitude of merits for destitute people and society, provided that the budget spends sagaciously and progressively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | angellica | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Saahaar | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-16 | nguyenana611 | 67 | view |
- The layout demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to produce customer products and the way information is return to previous steps. 89
- It is true that disabled people encounter various difficulties in their lives in all corner of the world. 78
- It is true to say that in the new millennium, the general public tends to follow specific similar lifestyle in terms of clothing, meals, and types of TV programs. 78
- The figures demonstrate the global water proportion utilized in three sectors per km3 over the course of a one hundred year and various data in this regard in two nations. 89
- It is true to say that in the new millennium people pay too much attention to monetary things 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... It is claimed that donating a sum of ones salary to benevolent organizations coul...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32288401254 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12473620903 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567398119122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2758837115 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.363636364 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165282539607 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625972265124 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415704482888 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863163064438 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059707659527 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.