Today, it is a trend that tourists of one country are willing to visit the cultural and historical attractions in another country to appreciate the culture and history of that country. People often argue that foreign tourists should be charged more than local ones when visiting the spots. Personally, I agree with this idea, whereas an appropriate way of charging is necessary as well.
First off, some places of interest provide language assistance, such as multilingual tour guides or translation devices for foreigners in order to help them overcome language barriers. It is not surprising when foreigners are entitled to the kind of convenience, they are supposed to be charged for extra money. In addition, the preservation and maintenance cost of the cultural and historical attractions shouldn't be ignored. It is pathetic to find that some tourism attractions have already been in a poor condition due to a lack of maintenance fund. Furthermore, tourism revenue makes up a great part of some countries' revenue, especially some poor countries, whose economy are experiencing the depression. For these countries, charging more money for foreign visitors can increase tourism revenue, thus boosting their economy.
However, that is not to say that tourist attractions can charge whatever price they want for foreigners, which is irresponsible and immoral, resulting in bad consequences. For example, a temple in my hometown once charged the foreign visitors three times as much the normal price, leading to a sharp decline of the number of foreign tourists. Everything is a matter of degree. Only by charging the foreign tourists a reasonable price, can tourist attractions remain its popularity and reputation among foreign tourists.
In conclusion, foreign tourists are supposed to be charged more than local ones when visiting tourists attractions of another country but only in a reasonable way. I believe that doing so can benefit the tourist attractions and the countries in terms of both tourism development and economic prosperity.
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 73
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? (Study Sample) 67
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 67
- Some people say International sports events help in world peace. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...the cultural and historical attractions shouldnt be ignored. It is pathetic to find that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...m revenue makes up a great part of some countries revenue, especially some poor countries...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...attractions of another country but only in a reasonable way. I believe that doing so can benefit th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40498442368 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9839033359 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548286604361 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5968334913 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188962853756 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652994165558 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513535062049 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117949706736 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367702494074 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.