Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often argued that, learning abilities and activities of a student would be valued by real written or verbal examinations rather than year through assessment like assignments and project works. However, in my opinion, although, formal exams have predominant position in academic year, other continuing valuation would also inevitable and not to agree with the statement which is not give a satisfied outcome.
On the one hand, yearly or in between formal examinations were seem to be useful in terms of marking criteria and to aware about the efficiency of teaching and studying as well. In other words, which is essential for the children and teachers to be conscious and evaluate the strategy of teaching by the result of examinations in words or in progress reports. Owing to the fact that, by checking student performance by what he or she may written in the appropriate level of questions and how the pupil understand the exact situation would be assessed. Similarly, authentic exam valuations and report would be indispensable for the future studies or job placements. For instance, conducting entrance exams for the admission of medical or engineering seats in all over the world by the support of various universities.
Not to be out done, it is often essential to grade the pupil by the performance in different projects or certain assignments in relevant or related current issues or subjects. Devoid of such performance may have difficulty of students to cope with the managerial role or problem solving situations in later studies or in terms of job descriptions. Student who cover the allotted project or research works during school time may have sustainability in future works. Not only that, by the strict assessment by the teachers for the associated themes would have clarify the problems and pupil could correct the mistakes from the student period itself. For example, student assignment for the eradication of malaria programs in India got a remarkable prize in all India project submission survey.
To sum up, common exams would be essential and effective path to evaluate a student skill in study area. Nevertheless, in my perception, the statement for not satisfactory comment for the other consecutive assessment criteria was disagreeable. Because, such project and course works makes up the student overall development in studies and future in some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | Nguyen Tran Quynh Thu | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | eyraen | 73 | view |
- Some people think that hobbies should be linked with technology, while others believe that it is not necessary for hobbies to be involved with technology. Discuss, what is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your 78
- When talking about success, we often think of people who are rich or famous. In your opinion, what are the qualities that characterise a successful person? Why do you think these should be the criteria? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 73
- Many people prefer to spend money and not to save it? what are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 67
- The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 2006 Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown Write at least 150 words 84
- In June 1996, an experimental flu vaccine was trialled in a large country town on females only. The result of this survey is presented in the following illustration.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
... or in between formal examinations were seem to be useful in terms of marking criter...
^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o aware about the efficiency of teaching and studying as well. In other words, wh...
^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'write' or 'be written'?
Suggestion: write; be written
...udent performance by what he or she may written in the appropriate level of questions a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in all over the world by the support of various universities. Not to be out d...
^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sment by the teachers for the associated themes would have clarify the problems a...
^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'clarified'.
Suggestion: clarified
...s for the associated themes would have clarify the problems and pupil could correct th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2421875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95359688139 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533854166667 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.6396591342 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169012735387 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583095555335 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420114210905 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115547560064 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482558369285 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.