Fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) are the main sources in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) is encouraged. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Despite the fact that we live in an age when many countries consider fossil fuels as the main resources, in some nations, renewable sources of energy such as wind power still receive positive encouragement. In my view, the merits of these incentives prevail over their downside.
On the one hand, one of the most significant stumbling blocks of these non-conventional energies is that they are considered to be exorbitant. With regard to the former, households may have to allocate an eye-watering cost to install these power plants. A good illustration of this can be seen in the UK where the cost of installing heat pumps, a machine that is viewed to be environmentally friendly, into someone’s home could hit 35,000 pounds. As a result, those families who face financial problems may incline not to afford these systems. However, If your home and pockets are fit for installing these machines, in the long term these can offer some certainty amid the massively fluctuating gas prices and the related energy prices over the years, decreasing one’s dependence on such a volatile market, particularly now.
Nevertheless, despite the aforementioned downsides, there are several advantages which can be reaped from these renewable sources of energy. Chief among these is that the value of these energies does not come in financial form, but rather, in terms of predictability and eco-friendliness. Compared to fossil fuel ones, these sources of energy provide more renewable energy, capable of generating energy for less effort and require little-to-no electricity to run, thereby saving a substantial amount of workforce and money. Another benefit could be that these energies can be used as a means to generate money. Since this can produce a great amount of energy easily, it can be utilised to vend the redundant ones to authorities and thus alleviating the pressure on family expenditure.
In conclusion, despite the demerits of alternative sources of energy including expensive installation costs, the positive effects in terms of eco-friendliness are of greater benefit. Therefore, I hold the belief that this development is such a positive one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | Koi | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | jessica135 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | jessica135 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Vinhh | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31486880466 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10564193965 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.985277581 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.214285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201111931035 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694786765357 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780625566887 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146733191042 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718510586069 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.