Fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) are the main sources in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In many parts of the world, despite fossil fuels being the primary sources for energy production, it is suggested that alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar energy should rather be exploited. Although I deem that this suggestion is not without negatives, its positives would be more significant.
There could be two disadvantages of the change towards using renewable energy. Firstly, prohibitive construction costs of plants that exploit such power would place a heavy burden on government funds. For example, it would cost the government
millions of dollars to build a hydroelectric dam or install solar panels to harness solar power on a large scale. Secondly, it would be demanding to operate wind turbines or solar panels every hour. Specifically, some countries where wind is
usually light are unable to rely on wind power, and they cannot use solar power to generate electricity at night, which proves such sources of energy to be ineffective.
Nonetheless, due to certain great benefits, I believe that promoting the use of alternative energy seems vital. First, in light of environmental contamination, renewable energy could be a good substitute for fossil fuels. In comparison with
fossil fuels which emit tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions when they are burned, wind, solar and tidal power are entirely natural sources of energy which prove eco-friendly and release no harmful gases, reducing the levels of air pollutants and
improving the air quality. Furthermore, fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil, are finite resources and will soon be depleted, which will potentially threaten the economy if there are no alternative sources. This fact emphasizes the need to develop renewable energy to gradually replace traditional sources when fossil fuels run out.
In conclusion, notwithstanding a number of drawbacks of harnessing alternative energy, the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is a positive and sustainable development for the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | Koi | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | jessica135 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | jessica135 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Vinhh | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many believe that living in a city offers greater benefits compared to life in the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- There is certainly a difference in thoughts ideas and actions between children their parents and grandparents Why do these differences exist Does it cause problems in your community in your opinion 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays the differences between countries are becoming less evident because people follow the same media Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... a good substitute for fossil fuels. In comparison with fossil fuels which emit tonnes of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46945337621 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94217665509 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581993569132 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2215829521 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347866982043 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116127552792 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862990746982 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154910047903 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648827977111 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.