Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development?
While fossil fuels play a vital role in energy sources of some nations, others put their priorities on utilization of alternative recycle or green ones. From my perspective, I strongly suppose that is is a positive trend. The reasons for it are twofold.
In term of the environmental side, green sources of energy are advantageous in some ways. Initially, the increase uses of wind or solar powers create favorable conditions to cultivate fresh environment. Indeed, while the emissions from the consumption of fossil fuels are the main causes of greenhouse, wind or solar energies seem to have insignificant impact to the environment. Further and even more importantly, it is due to countless tons of oil or coals burned, not only the quality of the air but also that of water or land are deteriorated. This, either directly or indirectly, is conducive to the dead of a variety of species, even though human as a whole.
Regarding to the economic view, the enhancement utilization of wind or solar energy sources is more beneficial in long-term development. Firstly, it is true that those sources are nearly unlimited, which enables countries access to the economical mean of energy. Nonetheless, coal or natural gas are forecasted to be ran out in forthcoming decades. Nations that heavily rely on the mining of those sources of energy may face a burden in power shortage in forseenable future. Secondly, strengthening replaceable energies motivates organizations to give birth of valuable methodologies/products to cultivate goodwill from consumers. Let ‘s take ABC corporation as a stark example, had it not been for their huge investment in research and development solar panels to provide electricity for urban areas in VN, the company would have never earn wide reputation for their contribution to the peak of top among respected profit-organization in this country, giving them the easier access to accumulate customers loyalty.
I would not go too far to deny all the advantages of fossil fuels such as cheap and available in short-term use. However, it is undeniable that hardly could those bright sides remain for next some decades.
By the way of conclusion, I once again re-firm my viewpoint that priorities on the use of alternative energy sources bring more benefits for nations in long-term on the ground of both environmental and economic views. Thus, I believe that it is positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | Dongz Nguyen | 78 | view |
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...my perspective, I strongly suppose that is is a positive trend. The reasons for it ar...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 810, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reas in VN, the company would have never earn wide reputation for their contribut...
^^
Line 9, column 812, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...as in VN, the company would have never earn wide reputation for their contribution ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in short, such as, by the way, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21336760925 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20825505886 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562982005141 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3860477114 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310107290233 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863604968108 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600981363819 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157306872193 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401475857785 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.