The freedom to work and live anywhere has become the main trend due to development of communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of these development outweigh the disadvantages? Discuss.

There is no denying that the rapid development of communication technology and transport enables people to work and live wherever they want. It is, in some extent, beneficial to individuals and governments. From my personal perspectives, however, more problems than benefits will surface with this trend.

On the one hand, it is of difficulty for governments to manage the citizens. If a great number of people choose to live and work anywhere, they want without limitations, with the advanced communication technology and the increased transportation, it is hard for governments to regular the highly mobile people. As a consequence, it may have a detrimental effect on the safety and stability of society.

On the other hand, another disadvantage of this trend is that it might do harm to the environment and diminish the quality of life. Because of the better medical care and education resources, many people tend to migrate from rural areas to some metropolis. It is easy to understand that the population in these cities are continuing to increase. As a result, the prices of houses and other daily necessities might soar. What is worse, due to the increase of labor, more industrial factors may be built, which is definitely harmful to the environment.

Admittedly, there are also some advantages to this trend. People may get a better job if they can choose the work place. It is no doubt that more suitable or nice job with high salary available in metropolis than rural areas. By choosing to live and work in large cities, employees who come from destitute areas can achieve a successful career. But, at the same time, it can also increase the life expenses and pressure.

In conclusion, it is true that, recently, people have the ability to choose the life and work place based on the exist technologies, and it can help individuals in some cases. But I believe that some policies should implement to regular and limit the migration of citizens.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...choose the life and work place based on the exist technologies, and it can help individua...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00914634146 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91773071297 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0687435 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16300250015 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428906205701 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575923947817 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831816967492 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437109931484 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.