Full-time university students should take a lot of time to study, but it is essential to be involved in other activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Participation in social activities has inevitably become more vital for full-time university students besides a long time studying at school, which regards as a topic of concern for the schooling lifestyle. From my personal perspectives, I totally embrace this notion due to the following reasons.
First and foremost, involvement in extracurricular activities would extend the students’ relationships. A particularly convincing justification is that when individuals join a certain activity hosted by any organization, they will have an opportunity to make new friends who have the same fate and interest as well as conceivably share each other about their own stories. Additionally, it is a chance for students needing to gain more knowledge and skills to meet seniors who possibly help them enlarge their experienced horizon by what they know thoroughly. As a result, after assisting a social activity, what students would eventually perceive is the revival of their ambition and endeavors via the meetings with people that they admire and respect.
On the other hand, it is comprehensible if full-time students barely investigate their whole precious time in studying. Having several benefits relating to social ability development, involvement in extraneous activities has become an obligatory requirement in the recruitment process in some processes in some enterprises. In detail, some supervisors believe that candidates, who used to join in communal activities, already obtained a diversity of efficient skills such as negotiation, flexibly dealing with random obstacles, and time management.
In conclusion, all the standpoints lead me to a concrete opinion that full-time students should not ignore to engage in some activities after finishing the study at the campus by the virtue of their significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | Jenna Vu | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Nguyễn Tấn Anh | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | Vicky Phan | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | thaotrinh | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 84
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the result of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about it services 78
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 84
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67765567766 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27843534458 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2056270142 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257787917395 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991466596923 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08119379417 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15805923991 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345739672082 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.