In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is anticipated that online reading will soon take place of traditional reading habit since readers do not have to pay for anything. In my point of view, while digital newspaper and books can bring many advantagous benefits, I disagree with the idea that it will soon supplant the traditional way of reading.
On the one hand, it is deniable thay traditional rading turning into the online form can come with some beneficial suppoirts to human being in reading habit. The first thing is we can widen opportunities for readers in trying new types of reading. Due to the support of no-cast reading access, people are free to try any new genre of books they are interested in. Even if those new aspects are not appropriate for them, at least they will not have any feeling of regrets because they do not have to pay. Secondly, digital way of reading is a beneficial access to encourage more people to read. Since non-readers are free of charge, they will be more willing to try reading newspaper or books frequently. Gradually, they will become real readers and get educated or entertained through reading easily.
On the other hand, the overdominace of online reading seems not fesiable for two following reasons. Firstly, reading newspaper or books without paying money is a disrespect to reporters and book writers. They are not able to be paid enough for their work with both mental and physical rewards when their composition are treated inconsiderately. Another point is that not anyone is computer-literate, especailly the elderly. If this situation turns into reality, people might get struggle dealing with access for reading. Many people literally have to learn everything at the beginning which can lead to difficulty for people with old ages since they are mostly out of ability to catch up with new techniques.
In conclusion,while digital reading with free charge sounds attractive and has various potentials in development of reading, I still hope that readers will preserve the habit of reading in the conventional way
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'beneficial access'.
Suggestion: beneficial access
...ay. Secondly, digital way of reading is a beneficial access to encourage more people to read. Since...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to deal'.
Suggestion: to deal
...into reality, people might get struggle dealing with access for reading. Many people li...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...h up with new techniques. In conclusion,while digital reading with free charge sounds...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02662721893 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81635826627 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53550295858 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8408984268 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329120911202 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110661220047 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718667207247 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196100437253 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625688306523 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.