Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree?
Learning in traditional classes or learning on the Internet is still a controversial problem in the world today. Nevertheless, from my point of view, I believe that giving lectures and lessons in auditoriums to numerous students is more beneficial than learning online.
First of all, learning in a face-to-face way is really effective. There are multiple students in the class studying together, so there is not only one student studying. This means they will not feel lonely, and it can be a motivation for them to study harder to follow others. In online classes, there is only one person to learn. As a result, it is easy for them to eat, sleep, or play during the class without any reminder or warning of teachers. In an unexpected circumstance, the WiFi disappears immediately, making the lesson uncompleted. Therefore, the progress of learning will be decreased seriously. Unlike online classes, all the students in the class have to pay attention to the teacher every time, if not they will get punishment or detention.
Besides, learning traditionally makes the social interaction between teachers and students increase. Teachers and students can have a conversation without any "no Internet connection" which can interrupt them. After class, students can ask teachers more about the knowledge, so they can do the project more perfectly. That is because the time is not limited, which means the study time will be longer. Moreover, teachers can have more time to explain the lectures to students, so they can understand them in a better way. Teachers and students can understand more about each other, making the distance between two generations shorter and shorter day by day. Of course, this is pretty good for the learning process. Conversely, learning online makes a teacher talk by herself or himself. When the teacher asks, there is no voice to reply to her question. All is just silence and silence. This can cut the contact between the lecturer and the class, leading to a boring and ineffective lesson.
To sum up, face-to-face learning is still the most effective way until now, even though technology is developing day by day. I hope that in the future, traditional learning will be maintained and continued.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-18 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Ranjeet brar | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Vinuki | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Learning in traditional classes or learn...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more beneficial than learning online. First of all, learning in a face-to-face...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a face-to-face way" with adverb for "face-to-face"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g online. First of all, learning in a face-to-face way is really effective. There are multiple...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they will get punishment or detention. Besides, learning traditionally makes th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to a boring and ineffective lesson. To sum up, face-to-face learning is stil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, of course, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10899182561 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88793890291 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520435967302 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9458946097 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5217391304 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78260869565 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133965264464 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405075052793 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0187002810996 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084968940675 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182498859271 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.