A global crisis is possibly affected by the rise of round-the-world population since job vacancy numbers cannot accept all job applicants. Others, by contrast, claim that due to launching new start-up companies, a large number of people may improve the economy and society internationally.
Presumably, one reason involves a wide range of crisis because employment opportunities and unemployment proportions are significant different. The origin of this phenomenon is the high of birth rate in a year. Some families still think primitive which the more having children, the more income would be gained. By the next 20 years, consequently, the number of adults would experience a dramatic increase, and the competition among those to obtain a job are likely to become very strict. A 2016 BBC reported that over 1,500 million infants were born monthly in China, this country will not predictably accommodate their own citizens either housing or career opportunities. Despite this, a different mind-set is shown which new ideas will arise by obtaining high range population.
On the other hand, if having many people in a nation, new thoughts of creating both new products and new services would highly emerge. The reason is that the competition between young ventures to attract customers is really competitive. As a result, many new companies are established. According to the latest research, United States ranked first for start-up enterprises quantities globally in 2017, and those participated roughly 30% for national annually income. As such, jobless rate in this nation is very low, and difficult situations regarding over population might be avoided.
In conclusion, over-limited people number might induce international crisis because of high level of unemployment. This phenomenon, however, may lead the improvement of economy sector and citizens' affluence. It is suggested that government should issue new regulations about limitation of having children to minimise birth rates in the future
A global crisis is possibly affected by the rise of round-the-world population since job vacancy numbers cannot accept all job applicants. Others, by contrast, claim that due to launching new start-up companies, a large number of people may improve the economy and society internationally.
Presumably, one reason involves a wide range of crisis because employment opportunities and unemployment proportions are significant different. The origin of this phenomenon is the high of birth rate in a year. Some families still think primitive which the more having children, the more income would be gained. By the next 20 years, consequently, the number of adults would experience a dramatic increase, and the competition among those to obtain a job are likely to become very strict. A 2016 BBC reported that over 1,500 million infants were born monthly in China, this country will not predictably accommodate their own citizens either housing or career opportunities. Despite this, a different mind-set is shown which new ideas will arise by obtaining high range population.
On the other hand, if having many people in a nation, new thoughts of creating both new products and new services would highly emerge. The reason is that the competition between young ventures to attract customers is really competitive. As a result, many new companies are established. According to the latest research, United States ranked first for start-up enterprises quantities globally in 2017, and those participated roughly 30% for national annually income. As such, jobless rate in this nation is very low, and difficult situations regarding over population might be avoided.
In conclusion, over-limited people number might induce international crisis because of high level of unemployment. This phenomenon, however, may lead the improvement of economy sector and citizens' affluence. It is suggested that government should issue new regulations about limitation of having children to minimise birth rates in the future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | Fachri040495 | 89 | view |
- Some believe that mass transportation is good, but this transportation has a setback. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- In some areas of the US a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be outdoors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.What is your opinion about this? 84
- the charts below illustrate which is of 3 fast food restaurants are the most preferred amongs teenagers in Vietnam and Indonesia in 2017 and prediction for 2027 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 38
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for travelling public in the US in 2009 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ue to launching new start-up companies, a large number of people may improve the economy and soci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, still, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57003257329 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05685010523 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644951140065 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4924471561 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356078901531 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101070870524 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177103358133 0.0667982634062 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286400454244 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.354628973217 0.056905535591 623% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.